This is all “the good stuff” the humans/Outlanders never taught –or even realized, in many cases.

 

Table of Contents:

  1. Introduction
  2. Vocabulary
  3. Exceptions
  4. Science Branches/Fields
  5. Progression
  6. The 10 Dogmas
  7. Example Lesson Formats
  8. Additional Notes
  9. Further Reading
  10. 2023 Update:  Astrology
  11. Images

 

Introduction:

At LHS, the finest science classes and teachers in the Universe are ready to teach you all they know.  If it leads to work in any of the “ologies”, we can get you to the point of total understanding and mastery right here, years before you start your job “out there”.  It is entirely possible, even probable, that you will already begin making PhD-level contributions to any scientific field/program/study by the time you leave our school.

 

Vocabulary:

sci·ence
/ˈsīəns/
noun
noun: science
  1. the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
    “the world of science and technology”
    • a particular area of science.
      plural noun: sciences
      “veterinary science”
    • a systematically organized body of knowledge on a particular subject.
      “the science of criminology”
    • ARCHAIC
      knowledge of any kind.
      “his rare science and his practical skill”

tax·on·o·my
/takˈsänəmē/

noun

BIOLOGY
nountaxonomy
  1. the branch of science concerned with classification, especially of organismssystematics.
    • the classification of something, especially organisms.
      “the taxonomy of these fossils”
    • a system of classification.
      plural nountaxonomies
      “a taxonomy of smells”
Origin
early 19th century: coined in French from Greek taxis ‘arrangement’ + -nomia ‘distribution’.

Due to retarded spineless Outlander humans “catering to the masses” in their modern era (near Shift; 20th and 21st centuries), some of them tried to pretend there was no classification more specific than species, but it is obvious there are many different members/types of each species, and we need a name for those differences.  The name is race.

A species is a distinct body form (e.g. horse vs. snake; those are different species, very different).
A race is a less distinct form; not different numbers or types of appendages, but maybe just different facial structure/features, etc.; distinct body parts, not distinct entire bodies (e.g. taller vs. shorter horses).
Even lesser variations, such as a fur pattern or hair color, and eye colors, and skin color, are the range of variations of a given race (e.g. the same size of horse, and the same facial/head structure, just with different mane colors, etc.).
..
Species examples:

  • bird, cat, cow, dog/wolf, fish, frog, horse, human, primate, snake

..
Race examples:
(in alphabetical order of species listed above)

  • bird races:  Blackbird, Blue Jay, Cardinal, Chicken, Crow, Dove, Eagle, Falcon, Flamingo, Hawk, Mockingbird, Osprey, Owl, Parrot, Peacock, Pigeon, Quail, Raven, Roadrunner, Sparrow, Stork, Swan, Turkey, Vulture, Woodpecker, Wren, etc.
  • cat races:  black, Bobcat, calico, mountain lion, Lion, Lynx, Siamese, Tiger, wildcat, etc.
  • cow races:  black and white cow, brown cow, etc.
  • dog races:  Chow, Doberman, Siberian Husky, etc.
  • fish races:  lion fish, tuna, swordfish, etc.
  • frog races:  bullfrog, rain frog, toad, etc.
  • horse races:  Mustang, Stallion, etc.
  • human races:  African/Negroid, Aryan/Caucasian, Asian/Mongoloid, etc.
  • primate races:  ape, baboon, chimpanzee, gorilla, monkey
  • snake races:  Cobra, Coral, Rattlesnake, Sea-snake, Viper, etc.

Call things what they are.
There is nothing wrong with the term “race”.

Regarding why groups of animals have names (instead of just being called “group of _”):  A group of owls is called a “parliament”.
Why?
A lot of the group names come from either the sound the species makes (gaggle of geese, scold of jays) or how they look (“stand” of flamingos). For instance, a “parliament” of owls refers to their perceived knowledge and wisdom.

more TBA

 

Exceptions:

We do not include social sciences (a.k.a. social studies) in this class; it has its own class/category in our educational system.

Philosophy is technically a science, but it is more of a Social Studies sub-topic/-field, in our opinion.

 

Science Branches/Fields:

  • Biology (including Astrobiology, Microbiology, Xenobiology, etc.)
  • Chemistry (including Biochemistry, and the Periodic Table of the Elements beyond the 118 elements humans teach)
  • Computer(s); engineering, programming, repairing, technical support, etc. (including thoughts about my idea for making a version of acupuncture for computer hardware; keeping it running well –even Outlander products which have planned obsolescence)
  • Cymatics
  • Earth Science
  • Electro-gravitics
  • Geology
  • Life Science (including Botany, Ecology, Zoology, etc.)
  • Meteorology
  • Oceanography
  • Physics (including Astrophysics, Particle Physics, Thermodynamics, etc.)
  • Sigils Science
  • Space Science (including Astronomy

Further information about the sub-disciplines can be found here.

 

Progression by Year (School-grade):

  1. Phones (in tele-comm)
  2. PDAs (in comp-sci)
  3. Computers (in comp-sci)
  4. Radios (in tele-comm)
  5. Satellites (in tele-comm)
  6. Ansible (tele-comm)
  7. Chemistry (including subatomic particles)
  8. Biology
  9. Pharmacology
  10. Genetic Engineering (in engin-eering
  11. Programming (in comp-sci)
  12. Thermodynamics
  13. Exodus
  14. Alchemy (in chemistry), Metallurgy (in chem.)
  15. Repulsines (in engin-eering)
  16. Astrophysics (in physics)

 

The 10 Dogmas:

dog·ma
/ˈdôɡmə/
noun
noundogmaplural noundogmas
  1. a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.
    “the rejection of political dogma”

These are assumptions humans/Outlanders came up with very foolishly, sloppily, and lazily, and which their mainstream then forced the teaching of (lying about) for generations.

  1. Nature is mechanical.  (It is, in a way, but not how they think/teach.)
  2. Matter is unconscious.  (Many things have consciousness, some to more degrees than other, and the cosmic bodies are no exception –nor is Space/void itself, nor is Time itself, etc.)
  3. Laws of nature are fixed.  (The laws of nature/physics can change and have changed –and their latest/upcoming change is that they won’t be changeable like this anymore; Auz’s will is stabilizing them.)
  4. The amount of matter and energy is always the same.  (This is one of the wildest assumptions and sweeping generalizations ever; no one has any way of proving this, as no one has been everywhere (or every-when) in Creation.)
  5. Nature is purposeless.  (It has many purposes, and that should be obvious/evident.)
  6. Biological heredity is material.  (People are formed/gestated and born, and to some extent even fine-tuned as they age, by mindset; visions being held.  It is the holding of a vision/idea/want… that causes the body, starting at the DNA level, if not even more microscopic, to do what it does.)
  7. Memory is stored in the brain.  (Then why do SSP recruits with memory-wipes start remembering things?  Brains are how the out-of-body consciousness/control sends signals to the nervous system.  Brains are proportional to the body, i.e. to how many nervous system fibers/nodes there are, not to intelligence or memory capacity, and brain damage only leads to difficulty in operating the body, not true memory loss.)
  8. Your mind is inside your head.  (That may be for some, but not all people.  For example, primitive robotic/computer creations do have software magnetically encoded into the hardware that is typically in their head-like or central/tower body-part, but a lot of other types of beings are not like that.)
  9. Psychic phenomena is impossible.  (Telepathy and many other forms of this ability/power have been proven many times, by many different people, in multiple ways.)
  10. Only mechanistic medicine works.  (It actually is what causes most harm/death –other than a nonvegan diet; consuming/assimilating death from the start.  Thinking that certain products/consumables correspond to certain effects… does not factor in how certain mindsets/visions/assumptions affect a patient’s system.  It is fine to have a mechanistic approach to medicine, so long as it is not limited to thinking that only pharmaceutical products are effective mechanisms for causing desired patient outcomes.)

11th dogma noticed, thanks to the movie Star Trek:  Into Darkness (2013):

  • moons orbit planets, planets orbit stars, stars orbit galactic centers, etc. — August 2023:  Humans assumed that gravity is what holds stars and planets in orbits, but what if it was Space that is orbiting them, and all of them are fixed, and that is just how the ideas of Sphere Beings work and appear to us?

12th dogma noticed:

  • Humans assuming, claiming, and teaching that the elements and laws of physics are a pre-existing system they cannot change… stems from the identical template used by religion to brainwash the lazy and gullible into excessive default submission, dependency, and addiction.
    It isn’t wrong in general to accept a preexisting system (as some systems are good and work well); we’re just addressing the obvious reality/link regarding modern humans’ pseudo-science nonsense.

13th dogma:

  • Atoms are made of electrons, neutrons, and protons.  — January 2024:  The reason it SEEMS that protons, neutrons, and electrons exist…
    is bc ppl are manifesting that when they look at that scale;
    current humans are largely bipolar/conflicted,
    thus the tiniest particles around them… which are susceptible to their mind-energy-fields…
    end up being/becoming/behaving like what they are expected to.
    In other words, subatomic particles are different based on who is looking at them and expecting different things.
    Before humans looked at them, they did NOT have subatomic parts; they didn’t need that much detail/complexity.
    Particles behave differently around different types of beings/essences.
    ..
    While it worked for us to develop subatomic transmutation based on figuring out how to isolate and rearrange (change the ratios of) those subatomic particles, that is because we had caused those particles to exist, and even to behave how they behaved, in the matter/items that we were working with; this was just one way of transmuting/converting things.

14th dogma:

  • More structure requires more energy.  –That is false; that is a “principle” ASSUMED by chaos-based/essence beings such as current humans.
    They THINK more structure requires more energy… because their nature is to unDO structure/order/uniformity,
    evident in their self-altering madness, their infighting/wars, their lawsuits, their relationship discord/strain, etc..
    Structure (i.e. particles arranging themselves into repeating patterns / uniformity) happens naturally around those whose mindset or essence is to visualize, or hold the vision of, such structure/uniformity.
    Extrapolating from this, we can use it to detect who has inner conflict vs. inner stability/peace.  This is not to say that individuals with inner conflict are bad, only that they are going through some kind of debate or struggle.
    Also, focusing on love does not cause snowflake-like radial/bilateral formations of particles; being steady/unchanging in focus on anything does.  You, for example, can, at a time, love seeing, or want to see, a non-snowflake-like formation of particles, that desire and focus or mental vision then causing what looks like anger-based “disorder” of the observed particles.
    Also stemming from this, we see the real reason why humans think it takes incredible amounts of energy to move faraway cosmic locations/bodies (worlds, or areas of Space) closer (via warp-drives); it is their nature to seek and consume/drain lots of energy, because they are not creators/generators, but destroyers, and because they cause overcomplexity, and because they were brainwashed to assume they are dependent on esoterics and high-technology.  In other words, restructuring their “reality” (moving worlds closer via the warp workaround) requires more energy not in general, but due to their mindset/thinking/nature/focus.

 

Example Lesson Formats:

We don’t just teach things in a “dry” (boring/textbook) way; we make them interesting, hands-on, exciting, and fun.  We also add in humor to keep them “spiced up”, truer to life; relatable.  Take this way of explaining why Carbon is so interesting, from the atomic perspective:

“Carbon is like the slut of the Periodic Table –because it combines with all the other elements.
It is how things are built, how great lifeforms are made; by ‘orgies’ of elements which stick together and swap partners in a consistent way, always attracted to each other, stable in their polyamory.”
Imagine not only a science class lesson being put that way, but said by one of the sexiest and teen-looking teachers you’ve ever seen; an ICV.  You’d probably pay attention in class, wouldn’t you?

THAT is how winning is done.
THAT is how Inisfree got great.
THAT is what makes relationships last and coursework get memorized/retained –for years –for a lifetime.

In Inisfree, we don’t teach things “dry”.  (We make them “wet”.)  The results speak for themselves.

Welcome to science class in the New World Order.

 

Additional Notes:

  • Be wary of Outlander “scientists”; they often pretend they cannot reproduce results when free-energy / sustainability-tech’ is invented… only because they are paid to slander/attack it, and/or because they are so brainwashed that they can only manifest what they were brainwashed to assume/believe in.
    Everything Outlander-human mainstream-science claims is real science… is corporate propaganda; pseudo-science –especially when they claim legitimate/freelance science is pseudo-science.  You can almost always tell who is brainwashed or a religion-‘tard scammer by who condescendingly uses the term “pseudo-science”.
  • Gravity is not a constant –and is based more on habit and desire, not merely mass.  It is more accurate to say that attraction is due to electrostatics, which are the energy resulting from habit/want, not merely because of how much mass is in/under the area/object.
  • how gene-theory was upgraded to thought-theory; genes only work when thoughts command/want/will them to
  • Space is only vast and expanding when you focus on it, just like anything can become.
  • The Periodic Table of the Elements is still just a theory listing manifested assumptions, not all the elements in the Universe.
  • The speed of light is not a constant; light can be bent, so light moving through Space (i.e. many different gravity-fields, changes speed many times along its very-long journey/ies)
  • Warping Space is not necessary to reach cosmic destinations / cross those distances –and even when you want Space to get bent like that, you can literally just ask it to; you don’t need a complex or dangerous/radioactive machine/engine to force it.
  • How amusing that humans went to so much trouble in their laboratories to prevent their chemicals and whiskers and skin cells from getting into their samples, but never thought to develop helmets or other devices which would also prevent their thought-energies / assumption-fields and auras, etc., from affecting the objects/samples they were working on/with.
  • Just like you can hide things via camouflage/illusion, you can wield and hide things from gravity. All it takes is imagination and time/focus; for the means to become known/manifested.
  • The force of atoms or subatomic particles does not hold us together;
    humans’ brainwashing/assumptions that it does… is what holds atoms together which/when they observe those atoms.
    What holds Us together is our own thoughts/urges.
    What holds pre-humans together is their Own urges.
    What holds the giants together is those giants’ will/urges.
    Etc.
    It takes a larger/greater ancestor/focus/will to make lesser beings, and then those beings hold themSelves tgthr… bc/if it was the will of their maker/s that they Be stable like that.
    Atoms and gravity etc. have no effect on the ancients/gods/stars… bc those beings never assumed those tiny things / forces existed in the first place.
    ..
    Extrapolating back in time from that concept, we might have an explanation for why there was once an era before gravity, dispersion, etc. existed.
    But what humans don’t yet understand is that there is still no gravity or dispersion in a Lot of Creation/All; gravity is local, existing only where it is assumed/expected to.
    ..
    The gods were not limited to walking on worlds designed to hold them there; they moved about, never thinking of a force such as gravity, thus never having or being controlled by one.
    Humans are controlled by nearly everything, unable to manifest/change Anything, except for things smaller/weaker than them, thus their invented/alleged molecules, atoms, forces, etc.,
    and thus their inability to ever control/wield Me; I was not one of them, I instead made by them as a mixture of things they Found, or I at least adopted by them somehow.

2024 January revelation/discovery/manifestation:  anti-photons, which we call/named “umbrons” (from root “umbra”); particles which actually cause/increase darkness/shadow

2024 March:  (regarding geology) We make sure students understand that it is a lie to claim that any landform or rock formed more years ago than the student was alive or present to observe. It is only correct to say that the student is using one method or another to estimate the age of any given thing. It is never okay to state that something formed thousands or millions of years ago unless someone was around to observe that formation that entire time.

 

Further Reading:

See our webpage listing all the “ologies” we do work in here at Inisfree.

Also:

 

2023 Update:  Astrology

In our science courses, we teach the methods through which astrology information was discovered, checked, verified, etc., plus how we can use the sciences to discover even more about the influence the planets and stars (Sphere Beings / Arch Angels / Valar) may still choose to have on us, including how or if that influence may have changed over the eras.

 

Also see:

  • “The Structured Atom” model; the new Periodic Table of the Elements, showing a modern theory about how atoms might only be composed of protons and electrons, bound together not be neutrons, but by the electrostatic force

Also see: